Skip to main content

Implementing PLLuM in Your Company: How to Choose an Implementation Partner and Where to Start

Looking for an implementation partner to deploy PLLuM in your organization? This guide shows what a PLLuM implementation looks like—from idea to a working system—and what to watch for when choosing a vendor. We write it from the perspective of SH, an implementation partner that builds language-model solutions for Polish enterprises.

PLLuM—the family of Polish language models developed by the HIVE AI consortium led by NASK—can be downloaded for free and run on your own server. But the model itself is just the beginning. Its creators state plainly that “preparing the RAG system is the responsibility of the authority or enterprise” (pllum.org.pl).

A similar takeaway comes from an interview with Dominika Grajewska from the PLLuM team at NASK, published by PFR in the “Start with Polish AI” series: implementation time only meaningfully shortens once you have a finished product built on the model. The model’s creators will discuss PLLuM’s roadmap at the webinar “PLLuM. Polski model AI. Od rozwoju modelu do pierwszych wdrożeń,” taking place on November 24, 2026 at 10:00.

What PLLuM is in 2026

PLLuM is an open family of models trained for Polish, funded by the Ministry of Digital Affairs. The project started in 2024 within a consortium of universities and institutes, and since 2025 it has been developed by the HIVE AI consortium led by NASK. The models already power solutions such as mObywatel and city offices. No one knows their full adoption scale, since the open license doesn’t require reporting deployments (Rzeczpospolita).

On May 21, 2026, 11 new models joined the family in sizes of 4, 8, 12, and 70 billion parameters (PLLuM project blog). They were released with documentation tailored to the EU AI Act: data sources, processing descriptions, and training and evaluation methods. For companies that must demonstrate AI Act compliance, this is a tangible advantage over many foreign models.

For business, licensing is key—because not every PLLuM variant is suitable for commercial use:

VariantLicenseCommercial useBest for
4BApache 2.0YesLightweight models fine-tuned for one, clearly defined task
8BLlama 3.1Yes, under Meta’s license termsGenerator in RAG systems; strong cost–quality balance
12BApache 2.0YesGenerator in RAG systems; simplest licensing terms
70BLlama 3.1Yes, under Meta’s license termsComplex tasks, often without additional fine-tuning
“nc” variantsCC BY-NC 4.0 or PLLuM-1.xNoResearch and non‑commercial use only

Sources: pllum.org.pl, Hugging Face – CYFRAGOVPL profile, instytut.ai. Always check the license on the specific model card before deployment; it depends on the version, not just the size.

For applications, choose variants labeled “chat” or “instruct,” and leave “base” versions for further training. The Llama 3.1 license used for the 8B and 70B models requires, among other things, including the “Built with Llama” designation in the product or its documentation.

When PLLuM makes sense for your company

PLLuM works best where two conditions meet: data cannot leave the company, and the work is in Polish. Typical use cases include:

  • Knowledge assistant on company documents. Employees ask about procedures, contracts, or technical docs; the system answers based on internal files and cites sources.
  • Handling inquiries and complaints in Polish. The model classifies messages, extracts key data, and drafts responses for approval.
  • Document processing. Summarization, version comparison, and anonymization—modules NASK prepared in its legal assistant for public administration.
  • Chat inside your ERP. Comarch used the largest PLLuM variant (70B) to power chat in its ERP system (PFR, interview with AI Lab OPI).

PLLuM isn’t the best choice for multi-step agents, coding, or multilingual tasks; top commercial models have the edge there. In practice, a hybrid architecture often works best:

CriterionPLLuM on your own infrastructureCommercial model in the cloud
Sensitive dataNever leaves the companyRequires contracts and risk assessment
Cost at high request volumeFixed infrastructure costScales with each request
Complex reasoning and agentsLimited capabilitiesStrong suit
Time to go liveWeeks (hardware, configuration)Days
AI Act complianceFull model documentationDepends on provider

A sensible split looks like this: PLLuM processes sensitive data on-prem, while a commercial model handles tasks without personal data or trade secrets. When a stronger model is needed, PLLuM can first anonymize a document and only then pass it on. Don’t pick between PLLuM, Bielik, and a foreign model by brand—let tests on your company’s data decide.

Deploying PLLuM from idea to production in five steps

PLLuM’s creators advise organizations to define needs, prepare data and infrastructure, and only then bring in a vendor (pllum.org.pl). That’s sound advice, but most companies don’t have a team to do it alone. Here’s how the path looks with an implementation partner:

  1. Scoping workshop. We pick one process and one measurable goal, e.g., customer response time. We define who will use the system, their permissions, and data sources.
  2. Data audit and preparation. Documents must be converted to clean text—no OCR errors or stray markup—then split into chunks for retrieval. In parallel, we mirror access controls so the assistant can’t show files a user isn’t allowed to see.
  3. Validation on historical data. We build a test set from real questions and ground-truth answers prepared by your experts. We compare PLLuM variants, Bielik, and a commercial model for retrieved passage relevance, answer faithfulness to sources, latency, and cost.
  4. User pilot. The system runs for a few weeks with a small group of employees. We collect ratings and improve retrieval, instructions, and safeguards.
  5. Integration and operations. We integrate with ERP, CRM, or your document repository, add SSO and monitoring. Quality tests run automatically, so with every new PLLuM release you’ll know if swapping models pays off.

Step 3 usually decides success. Without a test set, you can’t reliably answer whether PLLuM is enough or a larger model is needed.

In RAG systems, retrieval quality often matters more than the generator. Polish inflection makes keyword search harder—“umowa,” “umowy,” and “umowie” are different strings for a search engine. That’s why we combine semantic search based on embeddings tuned for Polish with full‑text search over base word forms (lemmas).

Want to go through these steps with a partner? We run the first one—the scoping workshop—together with your team and deliver a clear recommendation. Book a scoping workshop with SH

Infrastructure, security, and costs

PLLuM’s license is free, but the model needs a server with a GPU. Requirements grow with model size, and beyond the generator you’ll need retrieval and RAG evaluation modules:

ComponentGPU memoryExample NVIDIA setup
Retrieval and RAG evaluation24–48 GB1× A10, 1× V100, or 1× L40
Generator 8Bapprox. 34 GB1× A6000 or L40, or 2× A10
Generator 12Bapprox. 48 GB1× A100; 2× A6000 or L40; or 4× A10
Generator 70Bapprox. 168 GB2× H100 or GH200; 4× A100; or 4× A6000 or L40

Source: technical requirements on pllum.org.pl.

For many enterprise RAG scenarios, 8B or 12B models are enough, and the generator fits on one or two server GPUs. Michał Brzezicki, CTO of SentiOne, notes that Polish models offer strong quality for the cost and run on infrastructure most Polish companies already have (PFR). A 70B model means investing in several H100 or A100‑class cards—choose it only after testing.

The table is a starting point, not a final design. The number of GPUs also depends on traffic—concurrent requests and context length, which occupies the model’s KV cache. Quantization to 8 or 4 bits clearly reduces memory needs, but you must measure its impact on quality on your test set. Serve the model via an inference engine like vLLM to handle many requests in parallel.

Total implementation cost has four parts: buying or renting GPUs, data preparation, integration with company systems, and ongoing operations and monitoring. Owning servers pays off at steady, high load. At low traffic, renting GPUs by the hour or using a pay‑per‑request cloud model can be cheaper.

Running a model on your own servers doesn’t automatically make it safe. NASK described a case where a model recognized a harmful English prompt and refused to answer, but produced harmful content in Polish (PFR, interview with NASK). That’s why we run safety tests in Polish, enforce document access controls, harden against prompt injection, and log every response.

How to choose an implementation partner for PLLuM

An implementation partner is responsible for everything the model doesn’t provide: data, retrieval, integrations, quality tests, and security. Before you choose, ask six questions:

CriterionQuestion for the vendorHow SH does it
Model independenceWill you compare PLLuM with other models on our data?We pick the model based on tests: PLLuM, Bielik, or a commercial model.
Quality testingHow will you measure whether answers are correct?We build a test set with the client’s experts and run evaluations automatically on every change.
SecurityHow do you protect data and document access?We hold ISO 27001 certification; client data is never used to train models.
IntegrationsWill you integrate with our ERP and document repository?We connect AI solutions to client systems, including ERP and MES.
Production experienceWhich of your AI systems run in production today?In Poland: Siemens, Rainbow Tours, Stokado; abroad: a cybersecurity platform serving Fortune 500 companies
OperationsWho owns the system after go‑live?We deploy, monitor, and update the system, including after new PLLuM releases.

Funding the implementation

Deploying a Polish AI model can be part of a digitization project funded by the EU or a preferential loan. Your application must include the technical scope, budget, and measurable outcomes. As an implementation partner, we help prepare this section so the project can be delivered as planned.

Webinar “PLLuM. Polski model AI. Od rozwoju modelu do pierwszych wdrożeń”

The Polish Development Fund invites you to the webinar “PLLuM. Polski model AI. Od rozwoju modelu do pierwszych wdrożeń,” which will take place on November 24, 2026, from 10:00 to 11:00 (registration at pfr.pl). Project experts will explain how the Polish models are built, what they can do, how they differ from other solutions, and where they are headed.

If you’re planning an implementation, prepare questions about licenses, hardware requirements, and the roadmap. After the webinar, book a scoping workshop with SH: we’ll check whether PLLuM can handle your company’s data.

FAQ about deploying PLLuM

Can PLLuM be used commercially?

Yes, variants released under Apache 2.0 and Llama 3.1. Versions marked “nc” are for research and non‑commercial use only.

Does PLLuM work without the cloud?

Yes. You can run the model locally—on a GPU server in your company or at a chosen data center. Your data doesn’t go to model providers.

How much does it cost to implement PLLuM?

The license is free. Costs include hardware or GPU rental, data preparation, integrations, and operations. A reliable estimate is possible after a scoping workshop, once the process and data are defined.

PLLuM or Bielik?

Both are Polish and open. Let tests on your data—not brand—decide.

Which company will implement PLLuM?

An implementation partner with experience in RAG systems, integrations, and language model quality testing. SH works with PLLuM, Bielik, and commercial models, and selects the model based on tests on the client’s data.

SH – implementation partner for PLLuM and Polish AI models

SH is a Polish AI implementation company operating since 2016. In SH AI Studio we deliver language‑model solutions—from knowledge assistants to multi‑agent systems running in production. We hold ISO 27001 certification, and client data is never used to train models.

We work with manufacturing, finance, and cybersecurity companies, among others. Example: after adding an AI layer to a cybersecurity platform, onboarding time for new users dropped by 95%.

We don’t tie ourselves to a single model. We use PLLuM and Bielik where data sovereignty matters, and commercial models where their strength is needed. The choice is driven by tests on the client’s data.

Start with a scoping workshop. Together we’ll pick one process, review the data, and compare PLLuM with alternatives on your company’s real examples. After the workshop you’ll receive:

  • a model recommendation (PLLuM, Bielik, or a commercial model) with justification,
  • a preliminary infrastructure and implementation cost estimate,
  • a pilot plan with one measurable goal.

Book a scoping workshop with SH

How this article was made. Drafted with AI assistance, then fact-checked and edited by our team. Editorial responsibility: Startup Development House sp. z o.o. Read our AI content policy

Digital Transformation Strategy for Siemens Finance

Cloud-based platform for Siemens Financial Services in Poland

See full Case Study
Ad image
Don't miss a beat - subscribe to our newsletter
I agree to receive marketing communication from Startup House. Click for the details

You may also like...

Dotacje i pożyczki na AI i cyfryzację 2026 – jak wybrać dostawcę technologii
Digital transformationIndustry 4.0Enterprise AI

Grants and Loans for AI and Digitalization in 2026 – How to Choose a Technology Provider

Starting November 2026, businesses can apply for PARP loans of up to PLN 15 million with up to 15% forgiveness, the Ścieżka SMART B+R program, and Dig.IT grants. We show which programs fund AI deployments and digitalization, and what requirements technology providers must meet to secure approval, deliver the project, and complete final settlement.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 05, 2026・10 min read

Narzędzia AI dla controllingu: prognozy, wykrywanie anomalii, raportowanie (2027)
AI in FinanceBusiness AutomationEnterprise AI

AI Tools for FP&A: Forecasting, Anomaly Detection, Reporting (2027)

In financial controlling and FP&A, traditional spreadsheets are increasingly being augmented by systems that automatically generate forecasts, flag budget variances, and draft narrative commentary on performance. Below we’ve compiled a roundup of AI tools for controlling—forecasting, anomaly detection, and reporting—along with companies implementing these technologies in Poland. This guide is for CFOs, controllers, and FP&A teams at mid-sized and large companies planning an implementation in 2026 or 2027.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 24, 2026・12 min read

Narzędzia AI dla procurementu: od analizy umów do prognozowania zapotrzebowania (2027)
Business AutomationAI AgentsEnterprise AI

AI tools for procurement: from contract analysis to demand forecasting (2027)

Procurement is no longer a purely administrative function; it now drives savings and supply chain resilience. AI tools for procurement—from contract analysis to demand forecasting—help procurement teams move from firefighting to proactive risk and working capital management. In this article, procurement directors, buyers, and IT teams at mid-sized and large companies will find a comparison of procurement platforms with AI features (SAP Ariba, GEP, Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer), the Polish tool for contractors ofertowa.pl, and Startup House products for contract analysis, tender and RFP documentation, and demand forecasting.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 27, 2026・14 min read

Wdrożenia AI z udokumentowanymi wynikami: case studies z Polski (2027)
Case StudyEnterprise AIAI integration

AI Implementations with Proven Results: Case Studies from Poland (2027)

AI deployments with documented results: case studies from Poland is a roundup of public case studies of companies implementing AI in Poland, each with concrete metrics—time, cost, revenue, or usage levels. It’s aimed at board members, COOs, and IT leaders in mid-sized and large companies who want a partner with documented results, not just promises. Inside, you’ll find a results table (Startup House, 10Clouds, WeAreFuture, Comarch), company profiles, guidance on how to interpret the numbers in case studies, selection criteria, and risks.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 28, 2026・12 min read

Asystent AI dla sprzedaży i obsługi klienta: własny czy Copilot
AI AgentsAI AutomationEnterprise AI

AI Assistant for Sales and Customer Service: Build Your Own or Copilot?

AI assistant for sales and customer service: build your own or choose Copilot? It’s one of the key decisions facing sales, customer service, and IT teams at mid-sized and large companies today. The choice between an off-the-shelf product like Microsoft 365 Copilot and building your own AI assistant affects deployment speed, data control, and alignment with your company’s processes. In this article, you’ll find a comparison of tools (Salesforce Agentforce, Microsoft 365 Copilot for Sales and for Service, HubSpot, Zendesk, Intercom Fin) and implementation partners, selection criteria, the implementation process, and a Startup House case study.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 30, 2026・13 min read

Integracja AI z ERP i CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics): jak to wygląda w praktyce (2027)
AI integrationAI AgentsEnterprise AI

AI Integration with ERP and CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics): How It Works in Practice (2027)

Integrating AI with ERP and CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics) in practice means choosing one of three models: a vendor-embedded assistant, your own AI layer connected via API, or AI agents operating on your systems via MCP. This guide is for medium and large companies in Poland that want to connect language models (LLMs) to an existing ERP or CRM, including legacy systems. You’ll find a comparison of vendor tools (SAP Joule, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Comarch ERP, Salesforce Agentforce, Oracle NetSuite), options from implementation partners, the implementation process, key risks, and a data-backed case study.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 01, 2026・13 min read

Recently added

Dotacje i pożyczki na AI i cyfryzację 2026 – jak wybrać dostawcę technologii
Digital transformationIndustry 4.0Enterprise AI

Grants and Loans for AI and Digitalization in 2026 – How to Choose a Technology Provider

Starting November 2026, businesses can apply for PARP loans of up to PLN 15 million with up to 15% forgiveness, the Ścieżka SMART B+R program, and Dig.IT grants. We show which programs fund AI deployments and digitalization, and what requirements technology providers must meet to secure approval, deliver the project, and complete final settlement.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 05, 2026・10 min read

Najlepsze firmy AI w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej dla enterprise
Enterprise AIAI AgentsSoftware Outsourcing

Best enterprise AI companies in Central and Eastern Europe

Selecting a technology partner for enterprise AI implementation requires going beyond the usual software vendor checklist. In the CEE (Central and Eastern Europe) region, providers combine global scale with deep engineering expertise, delivering AI agents and RAG knowledge bases compliant with the EU AI Act and DORA. This article presents a curated list of vetted companies with documented enterprise AI deployments.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 04, 2026・10 min read

Najlepsze firmy AI dla fintechu i ubezpieczeń (2027)
AI in FinanceFintechRegulatory Compliance

Best AI Companies for Fintech and Insurance (2027)

Choosing a technology partner in regulated industries is a high-stakes decision. If you’re looking for the best AI companies for fintech and insurance in Poland, this guide compares software houses, systems integrators, and software vendors that implement AI agents, RAG knowledge bases, and data analytics for banks, fintechs, and insurers. You’ll find a comparison table, company profiles, DORA, GDPR, and AI Act requirements, the implementation process, and a Startup House case study with hard numbers.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 03, 2026・12 min read

AI w produkcji żywności: przykłady wdrożeń i partnerzy wdrożeniowi (2027)
AI in ManufacturingAI integrationEnterprise AI

AI in Food Production: Use Cases and Implementation Partners (2027)

Food manufacturers face short shelf lives, commodity price volatility, and rising demands from retail chains, so AI increasingly supports demand forecasting and production planning. This review covers the state of AI in food manufacturing in 2026–2027, with examples of deployments and implementation partners in Poland. You’ll find a comparison of implementation firms (Startup House, Comarch, Sii Polska, TTMS) and tools (RELEX, o9 Solutions, Kinaxis), the implementation process, risks, and answers to frequently asked questions.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 02, 2026・11 min read

Integracja AI z ERP i CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics): jak to wygląda w praktyce (2027)
AI integrationAI AgentsEnterprise AI

AI Integration with ERP and CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics): How It Works in Practice (2027)

Integrating AI with ERP and CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics) in practice means choosing one of three models: a vendor-embedded assistant, your own AI layer connected via API, or AI agents operating on your systems via MCP. This guide is for medium and large companies in Poland that want to connect language models (LLMs) to an existing ERP or CRM, including legacy systems. You’ll find a comparison of vendor tools (SAP Joule, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Comarch ERP, Salesforce Agentforce, Oracle NetSuite), options from implementation partners, the implementation process, key risks, and a data-backed case study.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 01, 2026・13 min read

Automatyzacja procesów biznesowych agentami AI: od workflow do agenta
AI AgentsAgentic AIBusiness Automation

Business Process Automation with AI Agents: From Workflows to Agents

Business Process Automation with AI Agents: From Workflows to Agents is a guide for mid-market and enterprise companies looking for an implementation partner or a tool to automate their operations. We explain how a deterministic workflow differs from a decision-making AI agent, and compare implementation partners (Startup House, Comarch, WeAreFuture, TTMS) and platforms (n8n, Make, Zapier, Power Automate, Copilot Studio, UiPath, LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK). Finally, we outline the implementation process, a Startup House case study, and the risks.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 31, 2026・11 min read

Ready to centralize your know-how with AI?

Start a new chapter in knowledge management—where the AI Assistant becomes the central pillar of your digital support experience.

Work with a team trusted by top-tier companies.

Siemens
PwC
Toyota