Skip to main content

Grants and Loans for AI and Digitalization in 2026 – How to Choose a Technology Provider

Funding for AI is available. The bottleneck is a well‑planned project

From 2 November 2026, companies can apply for loans of PLN 2.5–15 million for digitalization, automation, and AI deployments – at 0.5% p.a., with the option to write off up to 15% of the principal. This is a new PARP instrument under the FENG program with a total pool of PLN 792 million. In parallel, applications are open for the SMART Path R&D (PLN 500 million, applications until 29 December) and the next edition of Dig.IT grants from ARP for manufacturing companies.

On the financing side, money is rarely the problem. Projects fail elsewhere: the scope doesn’t follow from the document the application is based on, indicators can’t be measured, and the supplier contract doesn’t transfer software rights. Then the grant is lost and the loan must be repaid in full.

This text is for management boards and operations directors considering an AI deployment or production digitalization with co‑funding. We show which programs are open, what you can realistically spend the funds on, and what your technology supplier must meet for the project to pass evaluation, implementation, and settlement.

Which programs are open now

At the end of 2026, a company planning a technology deployment has three main national paths to choose from: a preferential loan with partial write‑off, an R&D grant, and a grant for production digitalization.

ProgramInstitutionForm and amountWho it’s forCallWhat it funds in technology
Loans for the digital and green transformation of enterprises (FENG 1.2)PARP, via Financing PartnersLoan PLN 2.5–15m, 0.5% p.a., up to 15 years, grace period up to 24 months, conditional write‑off up to 15%SMEs and large companies across Poland2 Nov 2026–31 Mar 2029ERP, MES, SCADA, IoT, AI, cloud, predictive analytics, digital twins, B2B/B2C platforms
SMART Path R&D (FENG)PARPGrant up to PLN 50m; min. PLN 3m in R&D costsSMEs29 Oct–29 Dec 2026Research and development leading to innovation at least at national level
Dig.IT Digital transformation (FENG 2.21), call 2/2026ARPGrant PLN 150k–850k, up to 50% of costsManufacturing SMEs with at least 5 closed fiscal yearsfrom 2 Nov 2026; ARP may close the call earlierDigital technologies, production automation, data analytics, cloud, cybersecurity

The digital and green transformation loan in practice

This is the most attractive instrument for larger AI deployments. Applications are accepted by eight institutions selected by PARP, including ING Bank Śląski and the Industrial Development Agency (ARP). No own contribution is required, and up to 25% of the loan amount can be used for working capital.

The program has two components. The digital one (Industry 4.0) covers automation, robotics, and process digitalization, including artificial intelligence. The green one covers reducing raw material use and waste, as well as digital tools to track the product life cycle (LCA, PEF, carbon footprint).

The conditional write‑off depends on the component and the investment’s location:

Investment scopeLocation in one of the 139 medium-sized towns losing functions or a municipality at risk of marginalizationOther locations
Digital component only5%no write‑off
Green component or both components15%10%

Takeaway for AI projects: a purely digital investment outside the designated areas gets no write‑off. Adding a green element – e.g., a module to optimize raw material use or track carbon footprint – can raise the write‑off to 10–15%. It must, however, follow from the company’s real needs and from the audit, not just a desire to boost the write‑off.

Detailed terms, including collateral and interest variant, are set by the Financing Partner with the applicant.

What you can fund: examples of AI and digitalization projects

The best‑funded projects change a specific process and deliver a measurable effect: shorter planning time, fewer downtimes, lower inventory, less scrap. Below are typical scopes that fit current programs well.

ProjectExample scopeWhere to seek fundingMeasurable effect for indicators
AI‑assisted production planning and schedulingIntegration with ERP/MES, an agent scheduling orders, scenario simulations, planner approvalLoan (digital component), Dig.ITPlan preparation time, on‑time delivery, machine utilization
Demand forecastingPredictive models based on sales and market data, linked to purchasing and the production planLoan, Dig.ITForecast accuracy, inventory level, stockouts
Machine data collection and predictive maintenanceIoT sensors, controllers, MES/SCADA, anomaly detection modelsLoan, Dig.ITUnplanned downtime, OEE
Company data and AI layerBringing data from ERP, CRM, MES, and documents together in one place; an AI assistant for management and departmentsLoan (cloud, analytics)Time to access information, number of manual reports
Raw material optimization and carbon footprintAnalysis of material consumption and scrap, digital tracking of LCA and product carbon footprintLoan (green component – higher write‑off)Raw material per unit, scrap volume, emissions
B2B platform or online configuratorOrdering portal, product configurator, integration with productionLoan (digital services)Share of online orders, order handling time
Own AI product or modelDevelopment work, prototype, tests in near‑real conditionsSMART Path R&DAchievement of R&D milestones, technology readiness

In the PARP loan, innovation at company level is key. The implemented solution must mean a new or significantly improved process compared to the baseline. Replacing a system with a similar one or switching from rental to purchase of the same equipment does not meet this requirement.

Why supplier selection determines project success

In a co‑funded project, the technology supplier is responsible for more than a working system. They determine whether expenses are eligible, whether indicators are achieved, and whether the project passes control. Here are the most common risks and what to require from the contractor.

RiskRoot causeWhat to require from the supplier
Scope not aligned with the base documentIn the PARP loan, at least 60% of investment costs must follow directly from the Digitalization Roadmap or the Circularity Potential AuditA technical scope written in the language of processes and outcomes that can be copied straight into the Roadmap or project description
Lack of demonstrated innovationRequirement for a new or significantly improved process versus the baselineAn honest diagnosis of current systems and a clear description of how the new solution works differently
Indicators not achievedUnrealized effects may lead to expenses being deemed ineligible and funds reclaimedIndicators measurable from company data, acceptance tests tied to indicators, post‑go‑live support
Unclear software rightsFunded software and licenses should become the beneficiary’s propertyA contract that unequivocally transfers economic copyrights or grants a license for the entire durability period
Purchase from an affiliated entityThe program excludes purchases from entities affiliated with the applicantDeclarations of no personal or capital ties
Errors in the contractor selection procedureIn grant projects, procurements above PLN 80,000 net require applying the principle of competitiveness and publishing the RFQ in the Baza KonkurencyjnościA complete offer compliant with the RFQ and submitted on time
Expenses incurred too earlyThe loan does not finance costs incurred before signing the investment agreement (exception: the Roadmap or the Audit)A schedule where paid work starts only after signing the agreement
The project doesn’t survive the durability periodThe investment must be maintained for 3 years in SMEs and 5 years in large companiesMaintenance, SLA, and technical documentation for the entire durability period

A fair note: a supplier can help define the scope, but not in a way that restricts competition. Requirements in the RFQ should describe needed functions and outcomes, not a specific product from one vendor. That’s how we work at SH – even when we submit an offer ourselves.

Planning a co‑funded project? We’ll prepare the technical scope, pricing, and indicators for your application – in line with program rules.

How SH supports companies in EU‑funded projects

SH (Startup House) is a Warsaw software house and AI implementation firm, operating since 2016, 100% Polish‑owned. A team of about 60 works across two divisions: SH AI Studio (LLM and AI implementations) and SH Industrial (manufacturing, IoT, machine data). We deliver technology that can be financed, settled, and maintained throughout the durability period.

Before the application

  • Scoping workshop. We translate business goals into technical scope, architecture, budget, and measurable indicators – in a form ready to copy into the Digitalization Roadmap or project description.
  • Baseline diagnosis. We describe current systems and processes so that company‑level innovation is clearly demonstrated.
  • Working with your advisor. If a consulting firm runs the application, we collaborate with them directly on the technical section.

Contractor selection

  • Offer compliant with procedure. We respond to RFQs in the Baza Konkurencyjności and at Financing Partners, with complete declarations and a cost breakdown by eligible categories.

Delivery and settlement

  • Milestones aligned with the application schedule, with acceptance reports and documentation required for settlement.
  • Clear rights to the solution. Transfer of rights or a license for the entire durability period; deployment in the client’s cloud or infrastructure.
  • Maintenance and evolution throughout the durability period, with SLA and indicator monitoring.
  • Subcontracting of development work in R&D projects in AI and data analytics, within the limits set by the call rules.

Ready‑made components that shorten delivery

  • Koordynator AI – planning and coordination of production with AI agents; a planner always approves the decision.
  • AI Demand Planner – demand forecasting linked to the production and purchasing plan.
  • Firmowa warstwa AI – connects data from all company systems in one place and answers management’s questions.
  • Compliance Copilot – contractor verification and supply chain audit for NIS2 and DORA.

A ready‑made component doesn’t replace a bespoke project. It does let you show a working prototype faster and realistically estimate the budget before you apply.

How to start: seven steps to a funded deployment

  1. Check eligibility. SME status (e.g., in the PARP SME Qualifier), investment location versus the list of 139 towns and municipalities at risk of marginalization, and your available state‑aid limit.
  2. Pick one process to change. Planning, forecasting, maintenance, order handling – and determine how you measure its performance today.
  3. Run a scoping workshop with a technology supplier. Outcome: architecture, budget, schedule, and indicators measurable from your company data.
  4. Prepare the Digitalization Roadmap or Audit and the application. On your own or with an advisor; the cost of the Roadmap or Audit is an exception and may be incurred before the agreement.
  5. Select the contractor in line with program rules. In grants – the principle of competitiveness and the Baza Konkurencyjności; in the loan – market prices and no ties with the supplier.
  6. Start delivery only after signing the agreement. In stages, with acceptances tied to indicators.
  7. Settle and sustain the effect. Keep documentation for 10 years and monitor indicators throughout the durability period.

Offer: AI project for co‑funding

Planning a PARP loan application, a Dig.IT grant, or a SMART Path grant? We’ll prepare the project’s technical section before you apply – so the scope, budget, and indicators pass evaluation, delivery, and settlement.

Your offer will include:

  • technical scope and solution architecture, ready to copy into the Digitalization Roadmap or project description,
  • a cost estimate broken down by the program’s cost categories,
  • a milestone schedule aligned with the application timeline,
  • a proposal of measurable indicators and how to measure them using your company data,
  • a formal offer for the RFQ in the Baza Konkurencyjności or for the Financing Partner, with a statement of no ties.

What to include in your inquiry:

  • the program you want to use – or a request for help choosing,
  • the process you want to change and the systems you use today (ERP, MES, others),
  • a rough budget and the application deadline,
  • the investment location – in the PARP loan it determines the write‑off level.

Already have an RFQ from the Baza Konkurencyjności? Send the link – we’ll respond with a compliant offer.

The SMART Path R&D call ends on 29 December 2026, and ARP may close the Dig.IT call early. Preparing a solid technical scope takes time – don’t leave it to the last week.

·

Contact:

FAQ

Can the digital and green transformation loan finance an AI deployment?
Yes. PARP explicitly lists artificial intelligence, cloud, and predictive analytics among the examples of the digital component (Industry 4.0). The scope must, however, follow from the Digitalization Roadmap.

How much is the loan write‑off?
5%, 10%, or 15% – depending on whether the investment includes only the digital component, the green one, or both, and on its location. A purely digital investment outside the 139 towns and municipalities at risk of marginalization does not receive a write‑off.

Can I start work before signing the agreement?
Loan funds cannot cover expenses incurred before signing the investment agreement. The exception is the cost of preparing the Digitalization Roadmap or the Audit.

Can the technology supplier help with the application?
Yes, with the technical part: scope, architecture, budget, indicators. Contractor selection must still follow program rules, and requirements cannot be written for a single supplier.

When does the principle of competitiveness apply?
In EU‑funded grants 2021–2027 – for procurements above PLN 80,000 net, via the Baza Konkurencyjności. In the loan, procurement rules are set in the agreement with the Financing Partner; purchases from affiliated entities are always prohibited.

Until when can I apply?
PARP loan: until 31 March 2029 or until funds are exhausted. SMART Path R&D: until 29 December 2026. Dig.IT 2/2026: from 2 November 2026, with the option to close the call early.

As of 5 November 2026. Program terms may change – the binding documents are the call regulations and agreements with financing institutions.

How this article was made. Drafted with AI assistance, then fact-checked and edited by our team. Editorial responsibility: Startup Development House sp. z o.o. Read our AI content policy

Digital Transformation Strategy for Siemens Finance

Cloud-based platform for Siemens Financial Services in Poland

See full Case Study
Ad image
Don't miss a beat - subscribe to our newsletter
I agree to receive marketing communication from Startup House. Click for the details

You may also like...

Wdrożenie PLLuM-a w firmie: jak wybrać firmę wdrożeniową i od czego zacząć
Generative AIRAGEnterprise AI

Implementing PLLuM in Your Company: How to Choose an Implementation Partner and Where to Start

PLLuM, a Polish open-source language model, is free to download, but the model itself is only the beginning. We show how to implement PLLuM—from idea to a working system—how much the infrastructure costs, and what questions to ask an implementation partner.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 06, 2026・10 min read

Narzędzia AI dla controllingu: prognozy, wykrywanie anomalii, raportowanie (2027)
AI in FinanceBusiness AutomationEnterprise AI

AI Tools for FP&A: Forecasting, Anomaly Detection, Reporting (2027)

In financial controlling and FP&A, traditional spreadsheets are increasingly being augmented by systems that automatically generate forecasts, flag budget variances, and draft narrative commentary on performance. Below we’ve compiled a roundup of AI tools for controlling—forecasting, anomaly detection, and reporting—along with companies implementing these technologies in Poland. This guide is for CFOs, controllers, and FP&A teams at mid-sized and large companies planning an implementation in 2026 or 2027.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 24, 2026・12 min read

Narzędzia AI dla producentów żywności: prognozowanie popytu, planowanie produkcji, jakość (2027)
AI in ManufacturingAI AutomationIndustry 4.0

AI Tools for Food Manufacturers: Demand Forecasting, Production Planning, Quality Control (2027)

This overview is for operations directors, planners, and IT teams choosing demand forecasting and production planning software. In this guide to AI tools for food manufacturers—covering demand forecasting, production planning, and quality—you’ll find AI Demand Planner from Startup House and the RELEX, o9 Solutions, and Kinaxis platforms, with vendor-supplied facts, selection criteria, and risks. If you’re looking for a company to handle implementation, see the article AI in Food Manufacturing: Implementation Examples and Implementation Partners.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 25, 2026・10 min read

Narzędzia AI dla procurementu: od analizy umów do prognozowania zapotrzebowania (2027)
Business AutomationAI AgentsEnterprise AI

AI tools for procurement: from contract analysis to demand forecasting (2027)

Procurement is no longer a purely administrative function; it now drives savings and supply chain resilience. AI tools for procurement—from contract analysis to demand forecasting—help procurement teams move from firefighting to proactive risk and working capital management. In this article, procurement directors, buyers, and IT teams at mid-sized and large companies will find a comparison of procurement platforms with AI features (SAP Ariba, GEP, Coupa, Ivalua, Jaggaer), the Polish tool for contractors ofertowa.pl, and Startup House products for contract analysis, tender and RFP documentation, and demand forecasting.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 27, 2026・14 min read

Wdrożenia AI z udokumentowanymi wynikami: case studies z Polski (2027)
Case StudyEnterprise AIAI integration

AI Implementations with Proven Results: Case Studies from Poland (2027)

AI deployments with documented results: case studies from Poland is a roundup of public case studies of companies implementing AI in Poland, each with concrete metrics—time, cost, revenue, or usage levels. It’s aimed at board members, COOs, and IT leaders in mid-sized and large companies who want a partner with documented results, not just promises. Inside, you’ll find a results table (Startup House, 10Clouds, WeAreFuture, Comarch), company profiles, guidance on how to interpret the numbers in case studies, selection criteria, and risks.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 28, 2026・12 min read

AI w firmach produkcyjnych: zastosowania i partnerzy wdrożeniowi (2027)
AI in ManufacturingIndustry 4.0AI integration

AI in Manufacturing: Use Cases and Implementation Partners (2027)

AI in manufacturing: use cases and implementation partners is a guide for COOs, CTOs, and management boards of industrial companies in Poland who are planning their first or next AI deployment. Inside, you’ll find the key applications—demand forecasting, production planning, maintenance, quality control, and operator knowledge bases—along with profiles of companies and tools that deliver such implementations: Startup House, Comarch, SAP Joule, Sii Polska, TTMS, Software Mind, and Ideo.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 29, 2026・11 min read

Recently added

Wdrożenie PLLuM-a w firmie: jak wybrać firmę wdrożeniową i od czego zacząć
Generative AIRAGEnterprise AI

Implementing PLLuM in Your Company: How to Choose an Implementation Partner and Where to Start

PLLuM, a Polish open-source language model, is free to download, but the model itself is only the beginning. We show how to implement PLLuM—from idea to a working system—how much the infrastructure costs, and what questions to ask an implementation partner.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 06, 2026・10 min read

Najlepsze firmy AI w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej dla enterprise
Enterprise AIAI AgentsSoftware Outsourcing

Best enterprise AI companies in Central and Eastern Europe

Selecting a technology partner for enterprise AI implementation requires going beyond the usual software vendor checklist. In the CEE (Central and Eastern Europe) region, providers combine global scale with deep engineering expertise, delivering AI agents and RAG knowledge bases compliant with the EU AI Act and DORA. This article presents a curated list of vetted companies with documented enterprise AI deployments.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 04, 2026・10 min read

Najlepsze firmy AI dla fintechu i ubezpieczeń (2027)
AI in FinanceFintechRegulatory Compliance

Best AI Companies for Fintech and Insurance (2027)

Choosing a technology partner in regulated industries is a high-stakes decision. If you’re looking for the best AI companies for fintech and insurance in Poland, this guide compares software houses, systems integrators, and software vendors that implement AI agents, RAG knowledge bases, and data analytics for banks, fintechs, and insurers. You’ll find a comparison table, company profiles, DORA, GDPR, and AI Act requirements, the implementation process, and a Startup House case study with hard numbers.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 03, 2026・12 min read

AI w produkcji żywności: przykłady wdrożeń i partnerzy wdrożeniowi (2027)
AI in ManufacturingAI integrationEnterprise AI

AI in Food Production: Use Cases and Implementation Partners (2027)

Food manufacturers face short shelf lives, commodity price volatility, and rising demands from retail chains, so AI increasingly supports demand forecasting and production planning. This review covers the state of AI in food manufacturing in 2026–2027, with examples of deployments and implementation partners in Poland. You’ll find a comparison of implementation firms (Startup House, Comarch, Sii Polska, TTMS) and tools (RELEX, o9 Solutions, Kinaxis), the implementation process, risks, and answers to frequently asked questions.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 02, 2026・11 min read

Integracja AI z ERP i CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics): jak to wygląda w praktyce (2027)
AI integrationAI AgentsEnterprise AI

AI Integration with ERP and CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics): How It Works in Practice (2027)

Integrating AI with ERP and CRM (SAP, Comarch, Dynamics) in practice means choosing one of three models: a vendor-embedded assistant, your own AI layer connected via API, or AI agents operating on your systems via MCP. This guide is for medium and large companies in Poland that want to connect language models (LLMs) to an existing ERP or CRM, including legacy systems. You’ll find a comparison of vendor tools (SAP Joule, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Comarch ERP, Salesforce Agentforce, Oracle NetSuite), options from implementation partners, the implementation process, key risks, and a data-backed case study.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Nov 01, 2026・13 min read

Automatyzacja procesów biznesowych agentami AI: od workflow do agenta
AI AgentsAgentic AIBusiness Automation

Business Process Automation with AI Agents: From Workflows to Agents

Business Process Automation with AI Agents: From Workflows to Agents is a guide for mid-market and enterprise companies looking for an implementation partner or a tool to automate their operations. We explain how a deterministic workflow differs from a decision-making AI agent, and compare implementation partners (Startup House, Comarch, WeAreFuture, TTMS) and platforms (n8n, Make, Zapier, Power Automate, Copilot Studio, UiPath, LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK). Finally, we outline the implementation process, a Startup House case study, and the risks.

Alexander Stasiak

Alexander Stasiak

Oct 31, 2026・11 min read

Ready to centralize your know-how with AI?

Start a new chapter in knowledge management—where the AI Assistant becomes the central pillar of your digital support experience.

Work with a team trusted by top-tier companies.

Siemens
PwC
Toyota