Skip to main content
Get proposal

AI Agents for Financial Services

We build multi-agent systems for the back office: reconciliation, regulatory reporting, risk triage and underwriting support. With the one feature that decides everything in this industry: a decision trail your supervisor will accept.

Book a free consultation

Trusted by enterprises across Europe and the US.

Siemens
Siemens Healthineers
PwC
Toyota
Geberit
Rainbow
Chooose
Omnipack
Lexolve

What is a multi-agent system in financial services?

A multi-agent system in financial services is a set of specialised AI agents for reconciliation, reporting, risk triage and customer operations that read and write through core banking and ledger interfaces, coordinate under an orchestrator, and log every decision with its inputs and rationale for supervisory review.

The problems worth automating first

Reconciliation breaks are worked one by one

Most matches are mechanical; the exceptions need judgement. Today your analysts spend their day on the mechanical part, and the close date slips anyway.

Regulatory reporting is assembled by hand

Data pulled from a dozen systems, validated in spreadsheets, corrected after submission. Every correction is a conversation with the regulator you didn't need.

AML alert queues punish your best analysts

High false-positive rates mean expert time spent dismissing noise, while the genuinely suspicious case waits in position 400 of the queue.

An example agent team: who does what

A multi-agent system works like a team with clear roles. Here's an example lineup for a financial institution:

Ledger / alert event

Orchestrator

Specialised agents

Reconciliation

Reporting

Risk triage

Underwriting

Claims

Approval gates per materiality

Financial systems

core banking · GL/ERP · AML/KYC · policy admin

Supervisory-grade audit trail: every decision, input and rationale is logged

Reconciliation Agent

Matches positions across systems, classifies breaks, and proposes correcting entries, posted to the general ledger (GL) only after approval.

Regulatory Reporting Agent

Assembles the return, validates internal consistency, and flags gaps before submission instead of after.

Risk Triage Agent

Prioritises anti-money-laundering (AML) and fraud alerts and assembles the case context, so your analysts open a complete dossier.

Underwriting Support Agent

Compiles the credit or insurance file, flags what's missing and what looks off. The decision stays with your underwriter.

Claims Agent

Verifies claim completeness and proposes the handling path; exceptions escalate.

Orchestrator

Routes the work, keeps the order of operations, and writes the audit trail for every decision: inputs, rationale, approver, model version, in the form a supervisory review actually asks for.

Not every deployment needs the full lineup. Discovery tells you which two or three earn their keep first.

Orchestration, approval gates and audit trails work the same way in every system we ship.

See how multi-agent systems work

Use cases

What this looks like in your operation

What the agents do

Reconciliation & breaks

Match positions → classify break → propose correcting entry

Regulatory reporting

Assemble data → validate consistency → reporting package

AML & fraud triage

Prioritise → assemble context → recommendation for analyst

Underwriting support

Compile dossier → flag gaps and signals → decision pack

Claims handling

Verify completeness → propose path → escalate exceptions

Treasury & cash

Cash-flow forecast → allocation proposals within limits

Systems touched

Reconciliation & breaks

Core banking, GL, ERP

Regulatory reporting

Regulatory warehouse, GL

AML & fraud triage

AML, core banking, KYC

Underwriting support

Scoring, core banking, external data

Claims handling

Policy admin, payment

Treasury & cash

Core banking, ERP, markets

What we measure

Reconciliation & breaks

Auto-match rate; close time; open items count

Regulatory reporting

Prep time per return; post-submission corrections

AML & fraud triage

False-positive rate; time per alert; team throughput

Underwriting support

Time to decision; incomplete-application rate

Claims handling

Claim cycle time; handling cost; appeal rate

Treasury & cash

Funding cost; limit utilisation; forecast quality

What the agents do

Systems touched

What we measure

Reconciliation & breaks

Match positions → classify break → propose correcting entry

Core banking, GL, ERP

Auto-match rate; close time; open items count

Regulatory reporting

Assemble data → validate consistency → reporting package

Regulatory warehouse, GL

Prep time per return; post-submission corrections

AML & fraud triage

Prioritise → assemble context → recommendation for analyst

AML, core banking, KYC

False-positive rate; time per alert; team throughput

Underwriting support

Compile dossier → flag gaps and signals → decision pack

Scoring, core banking, external data

Time to decision; incomplete-application rate

Claims handling

Verify completeness → propose path → escalate exceptions

Policy admin, payment

Claim cycle time; handling cost; appeal rate

Treasury & cash

Cash-flow forecast → allocation proposals within limits

Core banking, ERP, markets

Funding cost; limit utilisation; forecast quality

From first call to production

01

Architecture Discovery (2 weeks)

We map your process, systems and constraints. You get a reference architecture for your case, a recommended autonomy level per step, and a prioritised roadmap ranked by business value, whether you build with us or not.

02

Pilot in shadow mode (6-8 weeks)

The system runs in parallel with your current process, on live data, posting nothing. Agents match, classify and propose on the real flow alongside your team, and the side-by-side report goes to both operations and compliance.

03

Production (8-12 weeks)

Integration with your systems through a controlled layer (MCP where possible), approval gates wired to your materiality thresholds, audit trail switched on, security review passed.

04

AgentOps (ongoing)

Evaluation suites run on every change. We monitor accuracy, latency and cost per task, and re-evaluate the whole system when a model version changes, because a silently updated model that silently changes credit decisions is precisely the scenario your model-risk committee exists to prevent.

01

Architecture Discovery (2 weeks)

We map your process, systems and constraints. You get a reference architecture for your case, a recommended autonomy level per step, and a prioritised roadmap ranked by business value, whether you build with us or not.

02

Pilot in shadow mode (6-8 weeks)

The system runs in parallel with your current process, on live data, posting nothing. Agents match, classify and propose on the real flow alongside your team, and the side-by-side report goes to both operations and compliance.

03

Production (8-12 weeks)

Integration with your systems through a controlled layer (MCP where possible), approval gates wired to your materiality thresholds, audit trail switched on, security review passed.

04

AgentOps (ongoing)

Evaluation suites run on every change. We monitor accuracy, latency and cost per task, and re-evaluate the whole system when a model version changes, because a silently updated model that silently changes credit decisions is precisely the scenario your model-risk committee exists to prevent.

See how we've helped our clients

Embedded AI in a cybersecurity platform serving Fortune 500 clients: by embedding a conversational AI layer into the platform, we cut customer onboarding time by 95% and turned a quarterly reporting tool into a daily decision-support system.

Why us

Why enterprises choose us

We're a 50-person, cross-functional software development team based in Warsaw, Poland, building technology that delivers ROI, strong governance, and real adoption.

10

years delivering digital products

est. 2016

100+

products shipped

web & mobile

50+

experts on board

Product & UX designers, Software engineers, AI specialists, PMs

75

client NPS

Praised for communication, pace and quality

5

continents served

North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa

Frequently asked questions

Only a correcting entry that a human approved, or, if you enable it, routine matches under a materiality threshold you define, each one logged with its evidence. Nothing posts silently, and the threshold is yours to set.

By being auditable ourselves: documented architecture, exit strategy, model versioning, incident procedures and testable resilience, the artefacts your DORA register needs from an ICT provider. We've been through enterprise vendor assessments; we arrive with the paperwork.

Credit decisioning is a named high-risk category. That means documented human oversight, data governance, logging and transparency duties. Our architecture produces these as operating artefacts (named approvers, decision logs, model documentation), so compliance is a property of how the system runs day to day. Even outside the high-risk category, transparency obligations may apply. We map the applicable duties during discovery.

Through its supported interfaces, behind a controlled integration layer with full call logging, the same pattern we run in production elsewhere. No direct database access, no side doors around your change-management process.

Versioned models with evaluation suites that re-run on every change, drift monitoring in production, and a rule that a model version change is a change-management event, visible to your model-risk function.

Six to eight weeks in shadow mode: the agents match, classify and propose on the live flow, post nothing, and you get a side-by-side on auto-match rate, break classification accuracy and close-time impact, in a report written for operations and compliance both.

Which process would you hand to agents first?

Tell us how reconciliation, reporting and alert queues run through your institution today. We'll tell you which process agents should take first, which autonomy level is safe, and what the pilot would look like.

Book a free consultation

Work with a team trusted by Siemens, PwC, and Toyota.

Siemens logo
PwC logo
Toyota logo

We build what comes next.

Company

Industries

Startup Development House sp. z o.o.

Aleje Jerozolimskie 81

Warsaw, 02-001

VAT-ID: PL5213739631

KRS: 0000624654

REGON: 364787848

Contact Us

hello@startup-house.com

Our office: +48 789 011 336

New business: +48 798 874 852

Follow Us

Award
logologologologo

Copyright © 2026 Startup Development House sp. z o.o.

EU ProjectsPrivacy policyAI content policy